DACA is Officially 6 Years Old: Will it Make it to 7?


On Friday, June 15, the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) completed its sixth year of enactment. The article below discusses the shaky ground the program stands on and both the hopefulness and skepticism of current DACA recipients clinging to the American Dream. Currently, DACA recipients can renew their DACA status with USCIS, and we want to help you with those DACA renewals. Call our office today so that we can handle your DACA renewal to ensure that Dream lives on. 

Source: On Sixth Anniversary Of DACA, Houston ‘Dreamers’ Are Still Hopeful But Also Skeptical

Supreme Court to Hear (Again) What "Crimes of Violence" can Lead to Removal in Immigration Proceedings


As laid out by the SCOTUSblog (link below), the office of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has been rule maker and decider for a long time regarding what convictions will require the removal of non-U.S. citizens, with no judicial review to look over its shoulder to make sure people are not being wrongfully deported.

As it currently stands, a non-U.S. citizen legally in the United States can be removed if they are convicted of a "crime of violence" or a "crime of moral turpitude." The post goes into detail, with supporting caselaw linked, of SCOTUS's rehearing of Sessions v. Dimaya. In Dimaya, James Garcia Dimaya, who lawfully immigrated to the U.S. from the Philippines in 1992 and became a lawful permanent resident (Green Card holder), was convicted on two counts of non-violent burglary. An immigration court and the U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals interpreted these crimes, despite the criminal court's finding, as "crimes of violence" and ordered Dimaya to be removed from the country. Dimaya appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which found that the definition of violent felonies to be unconstitutionally vague and vacated Dimaya's removal order. Now the U.S. Attorney General's office has appealed to the highest court, contending that the court of appeals erred in applying the due process clause’s prohibition of vagueness in criminal statutes to a civil immigration law. 

This will be an interesting case to follow as it could determine whether our country's immigration administration will continue to have unfettered discretion in its removal of non-U.S. citizens, or if it will have to follow the law and be subject to judicial review.

SCOTUSblog: "Criminal removal - Is "crime of violence" void for vagueness?"

More Farmers and Ranchers are Using H-2A Workers


As documented by Sacramento ABC affiliate KXTV (link below), U.S. farms have seen a 20% increase in H-2A workers in 2017. The story states that the demand for H-2A visas has reached an all-time high in 2017 with the U.S. Department of Labor allowing the nearly 160,000 positions for foreign labor in just the first three quarters of the year. 

Our office handles H-2A applications and keeps you informed at every step in the process. Spring will be here before you know it, so call us today so that we can get started on your application for H-2A workers.

ABC10: "U.S. farms see 20 percent increase in H-2A guest workers"